Independent News
Ukraine update: Balancing desperate needs and uncomfortable reality
This post was originally published on this site
Over the course of the now more than two-month-long invasion of Ukraine, kos has written several times about the difficulty of integrating unfamiliar weapons systems into an army—especially when that army is already engaged in a life-or-death struggle. Every single one of these systems comes with its own training requirements, not just for the person whose finger is on the trigger, but for all the mechanics, electricians, and support crews needed to keep it operating in the field. For some systems that training can be done in days. For others it extends into months.
Then there were issues with the supply chain. Even if the U.S. or some other NATO country shipped additional weapon systems into Ukraine, they had to come with a steady stream of parts and ammo to keep them running. Why Russia has been unsuccessful at shutting down that supply chain is going to be a subject of debate for decades, but there’s no doubt they’ve tried. To a large extent, the push that Russia is making toward the town of Barinkove, southwest of Izyum, is about cutting supplies to Ukrainian forces in eastern Ukraine.
The more different systems a military is using, the more different calibers and types of ammo they require, and the more parts and varied training are required, the less likely something is to work when it’s needed. A piece of artillery may be just in the right spot, but it’s no good without shells. A tank may be prepared to breech the enemy lines, but it won’t operate if it blows an engine gasket and there’s no spare. An anti-aircraft system may be the shiniest thing on the planet, but if no one on site understands how to operate it, it might be literally worse than nothing.
As the weeks have passed during Russia’s invasion, the floodgates on heavy weapons have opened—as kos predicted they would weeks ago.
Part of the reason for that is simple enough: Time. It doesn’t make much sense to train someone on a system that takes six weeks to learn if the war is expected to be over in days. When it became clear that Russia wasn’t going to roll into Kyiv and put on those parade dress uniforms, it suddenly made a lot more sense to introduce weapons and systems that took more time to learn and more time to integrate with Ukraine’s existing systems.
In almost all cases, it still makes the most sense to give Ukraine more of what they already have—mostly variants of Soviet-era systems that match up well with the Russian opposition. They know how to operate these systems and how to repair them. Where they need to be modified to bring a NATO-spec vehicle into line with Ukrainian standards, Ukraine already has shops set up to make those changes. As long as a stream of T-72 tanks, S-300 air defense systems, and Mi-17 helicopters can be kept flowing, it needs to flow.
However, there are already a wide variety of systems being sent to Ukraine. As Oryx records, new deliveries include a wide variety of drones, six different radar systems, three new types of APVs, five kinds of howitzers (using at least two new ammunitions), and three different kinds of artillery (again, with at least two different types of ammunition).
As desperately needed as some of this equipment may be on the front lines, and as gratifying as seeing these systems in operation may be, particularly to the nations sending them, there is a real chance of helping Ukraine to death. Every truck that’s bringing 155 mm howitzer ammo is not carrying 122 mm. Or 152 mm. Every mechanic who spends a few weeks in Poland learning to repair an M198 is not learning to repair a D-30. Just shooting one round out of these things is not a cakewalk.
Watching the round-robin of calls between allied nations looking into what to send next can be extremely frustrating, and must be 100 times more frustrating in Ukraine. But coordination, cooperation, and those all important logistics have never been more vital than they are now.
Almost from Day One, the supply chain going into Ukraine has been “remarkable.” Ukraine earned the time to integrate all those new systems by fighting back against Russian forces in those first few days. They didn’t just prove Russia wrong, they proved everyone who thought that by now we’d be in the “Russia takes all the cities, while Ukraine is reduced to partisan warfare” stage was way off base.
They earned a chance to not just survive, but to win, and now NATO is doing what they can to bring in a steady stream of not just older weapons, but some so new that we honestly don’t know much about them.
It would be easy for NATO nations to treat the invasion of Ukraine like an opportunity to clean out the closets and empty the hangers of everything they want out of the way anyway. But the best thing to do for Ukraine is still what kos said back on April 8: Give them what they know, or things that—like a Javelin anti-tank missile or Switchblade drone—are essentially disposable.
It would be very easy to place an additional burden on Ukraine even while trying to help them, which is why all those meetings that are happening outside Ukraine, like the one chaired this week by the United States, are so important.
The more time Ukraine gets, the more it will be possible to replace older Soviet-designed systems with newer, more powerful, more effective systems. But they have to buy that time, and we have to help them.
Criminal appeals court halts Melissa Lucio's imminent execution, orders look at new evidence
This post was originally published on this site
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals on Monday halted Melissa Lucio’s execution, just hours before the mother of 14 was scheduled to be killed by the state for the accidental death of her baby daughter. Lucio sobbed when she was told the news by a state lawmaker, one of the many who rallied for a stop to her execution.
“I thank God for my life,” Lucio said in a statement released by Innocence Project. “I have always trusted in Him. I am grateful the court has given me the chance to live and prove my innocence.” She said her daughter Mariah, who was just two when she fell and died in 2007, “is in my heart today and always. I am grateful to have more days to be a mother to my children and a grandmother to my grandchildren.”
RELATED STORY: Texas board to make recommendation on Melissa Lucio’s case as advocates rally for her life
Lucio’s advocates had been anxiously awaiting word from an entirely different entity when the criminal appeals court handed down its decision. The Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles was to issue a recommendation to Gov. Greg Abbott by Monday afternoon, who would then decide if the execution would go forward or not. But following the appeals court ruling, the board said it would not be voting on her case.
“In a three-page decision ordering a stay to the execution that had been set for Wednesday, the Court of Criminal Appeals found that several of the claims raised by her lawyers needed to be considered by a trial court, including that prosecutors may have used false testimony, that previously unavailable scientific evidence could preclude her conviction and that prosecutors suppressed other evidence that would have been favorable to her,” The New York Times reported. KVUE shared the moment Lucio found out she would not die:
The petition submitted to the criminal appeals court by Lucio’s advocates earlier this month said the harsh interrogation technique used by investigators against the mom has contributed “to nearly one-third of all known wrongful convictions underlying the nation’s DNA exonerations.” One of the at least five jurors who has since regretted their decision sentencing her to death said they were never made aware of harsh techniques used against Lucio, or that she was a survivor of both childhood sexual abuse and domestic violence, which made her particularly vulnerable to such tactics.
Tivon Schardl, Capital Habeas Unit chief of the Federal Defender for the Western District of Texas and attorney to Lucio, said the mom is now entitled to “a new, fair trial.”
“Texans should be grateful and proud that the Court of Criminal Appeals has given Melissa’s legal team the opportunity to present the new evidence of Melissa’s innocence to the Cameron County district court,” Schardl continued. She noted, and thanked, the broad state and national support that urged a halt to the execution. In her statement, Lucio also said that she was “deeply grateful to everyone who prayed for me and spoke out on my behalf.”
“At last, Lucio will get her chance to mount a full and proper defense guaranteed to her by the U.S. Constitution,” the Houston Chronicle editorial board said. “Even as we celebrate this moment, we have to wonder how many others on Death Row deserve the same chance.” The Innocence Project pointed to a recent report noting that in the cases of the 161 people exonerated last year, misconduct by officials played a role in more than 100 of those cases.
“So thankful that a court finally stepped in today and stopped Melissa Lucio’s execution,” tweeted Sister Helen Prejean, the noted anti-capital punishment activist. “The death penalty is always horrific, but executing a mother for a crime that never even happened? Melissa was coerced into making a false confession 15 years ago. May the truth come out now.”
And may the truth come out for the untold number of Melissa Lucios across the nation. Innocence Project said the mom deserves justice, and that it will continue to fight to prove her innocence in court. The organization urged advocates to take a moment and send a message to Lucio letting her know that they will continue to stay in her corner.
RELATED STORIES:
Melissa Lucio, Texas mom facing execution for baby’s accidental death, asks court to spare her life
Melissa Lucio, Texas mom facing execution for baby’s accidental death, asks court to spare her life
DeSantis signs voter bill officially authorizing Gestapo-like election police force
This post was originally published on this site
Despite the fact that it’s been nearly impossible to find actual cases of voter fraud in the 2020 election, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis found a way to give credit to the Big Lie—complete with legislation authorizing an election police force.
DeSantis signed a bill Monday devoted to the GOP’s ongoing and dishonest allegations that former President Donald Trump’s presidential loss was the result of a stolen election.
“We’re taking a very strong stand against ballot harvesting. I think it’s justified and I think that people can have confidence that if someone’s voting absentee they actually got the ballot and they actually sent it in,” DeSantis declared at a news conference at Rookies Sports Bar & Grill, before signing Senate Bill 524 into law.
RELATED STORY: DeSantis out-Orwells Orwell with proposed $6 million police ‘election integrity unit’
According to CNN, the new law creates an Office of Election Crimes and Security in Florida’s Department of State with a price tag of $3.7 million; the originally proposed bill had a $6 million cost.
Under the law, DeSantis can hire 10 law enforcement officers dedicated to investigating election-related crimes. The measure also increases the penalty for submitting more than two vote-by-mail ballots from a misdemeanor to a felony, with a fine ranging from $1,000 to $50,000 for violating voter registration laws, CNN reports.
Democratic Rep. Tracie Davis told CBS News that DeSantis’ “so-called election reform legislation is a continued attack by the Republican Party to generate public distrust in the integrity of our elections,” adding that the bill is “unnecessary and a waste of taxpayer funds.”
According to a poll by the Associated Press taken in December 2021, only 475 cases of voter fraud were discovered related to the 2020 presidential election; 158.4 million Americans voted.
And perhaps DeSantis should be looking at his own party when it comes to voter fraud.
It hasn’t even been two weeks since we reported that Mark ‘Big Lie’ Meadows, Trump’s former chief of staff, was removed from voter rolls in North Carolina after it was discovered he was registered in both Virginia and North Carolina. Then yet another state popped up: South Carolina.
It’s widely assumed that DeSantis will run for reelection and could be a 2024 presidential candidate. In preparation for election season, the governor appears to be making it extremely difficult for Democrats to have a fair shot.
On Friday DeSantis presented a congressional map so gerrymandered that it was almost laughable, except that it wasn’t funny.
The Florida House voted 68-38 in favor of DeSantis’ map and sent it to the governor’s desk for his signature. The state Senate signed off on the map Wednesday; both voted along party lines.
Though the map will likely be challenged in court, it offers four more GOP-leaning districts, virtually erases Democrats’ gains in redistricting, and splits Florida’s 10th Congressional District held by Rep. Val Demings, a Black Democrat who’s currently running for Senate.
If the map is upheld, it would all but end Rep. Al Lawson’s congressional role by slicing up a district that extends through North Florida and merges Black neighborhoods in Jacksonville and Tallahassee, The New York Times reports.
“It’s so blatantly partisan,” Matthew Isbell, a leading Florida-based Democratic data consultant, told NBC News. “The only way you can create a 20-and-8 map … was to basically say, ‘Screw Black representation.’”
Wisconsin Dems held their own in recent local elections. Ben Wikler's here to talk 2022 takeaways
This post was originally published on this site
Contrary to conventional wisdom in Washington, not everything is coming up roses for Republicans out there in the states. Take Wisconsin, where Donald Trump and his allies are pushing an ongoing scheme to decertify 2020 that is ripping apart the Wisconsin GOP.
A February poll from Marquette Law school also held some bracing news for Republicans.
President Joe Biden’s job approvals (43% approve/52% disapprove) aren’t exactly great, but Trump’s favorability rating has plummeted to 36% favorable/57% unfavorable.
The favorables for incumbent GOP Sen. Ron Johnson, who’s up for reelection, are similarly dismal, with just 33% of Wisconsin voters viewing him favorably, while 45% view him unfavorably—his worst numbers in 10 years of Marquette polling.
At the same time, incumbent Democratic Gov. Tony Evers is faring relatively well in this polarized environment, with 50% job approval to 41% disapproval.
In April, thousands of Wisconsinites went to the polls for local elections. And in this supposed red-wave environment, Democrats held their own.
Today’s guest, Ben Wikler, chair of the Democratic Party of Wisconsin, recently wrote, “In a 50/50 state, during a tough year for Democrats, we won more than we lost. Out of 276 races where WisDems actively engaged, investing in organizing, digital, and/or mail to voters, we won 147 of the races.”
Here were some key takeaways from Wikler’s post:
- Democratic performance in conservative Milwaukee suburbs—relative to 2018 numbers—looked strong.
- Right-wing candidates in school board races in blue and purple areas—like La Crosse, Eau Claire, Appleton, Beloit, Fond du Lac, and Oshkosh—fell flat.
- Pro-democracy poll worker Pamela Gantz beat Kelly Ruh, a fake elector subpoenaed by the Jan. 6 commission who was running for reelection as a De Pere alder.
- Cavalier Johnson won in a landslide, becoming Milwaukee’s first elected Black mayor.
- Pheng Thao makes history as the first elected Hmong member of the Appleton school board.
Wikler also noted that despite some GOP successes, Republicans had failed to find a message that appeals to anyone beyond their base. And that’s where we will pick things up with Wikler. What issues and messages worked for Democrats, what didn’t work for Republicans, and what lessons should Democrats carry into November?
You can watch the show live right here on Tuesdays at 1:30 PM PT/4:30 PM ET, while the podcast version goes live Wednesday mornings at all the usual places, including Apple Podcasts and Spotify. A full list of places to download the show is available here.
Sen. Rand Paul on Russia's military attacks: 'The countries they've attacked were part of Russia'
This post was originally published on this site
I’ve said this before and I’m going to keep saying it until it becomes the theme of every story that so much as touches on the antics of Sen. Rand Paul: Rand Paul is a contrarian opportunist. That’s his schtick. Whatever anyone else has got, Sen. Rand Paul will come up with a reason why he’s against it, and if you stumble into agreement with something Rand Paul previously believed then Rand Paul will declare that now he’s against that thing and the nation will unravel if people like you support it. All of this is constant, cynical experimentation by Paul as he tries his hand at creating the latest Viral Fundraising Moment, some brief moment in time when equally contrarian Americans see Paul saying something and are willing to reward his gadfly nature with five American dollars. Possibly 10, if Paul can wedge the word “filibuster” in there somewhere.
Right now the nation’s attention is focused on Russia’s military attack on Ukraine, so that is where Rand Paul’s own attention lies. Rand Paul is vaguely aware that under Donald Trump, Republicanism drifted from perennial hawkishness to international nihilism, a new belief that America owes nothing to anybody and even our closest allies are treating us like “suckers.” Rand Paul has inherited a mailing list of longtime conspiracy cranks, more than a few of them raging racists, thanks to his father’s long career as contrarian opportunist. And Rand Paul is quite certain that the Trumpian wing of Republicanism likes Vladimir Putin, does not like Vladimir Putin’s enemies, and that Ukraine is bad because they wouldn’t turn over Hunter Biden’s secret DNC server holding Italian satellite-controlled Jewish Space Laser data even though Donald Trump asked them super nicely to do that.
And that is how we get this. Keep in mind: Rand Paul is a contrarian opportunist. He does not have principles; he merely puts on little one-man plays to see what reactions might net him the most fundraising cash.
If you watch that whole clip you’ll notice a few little details, like Paul having to correct himself after saying “Russia” to say “Soviet Union,” and most notably Paul’s determination to not take full ownership of the argument he himself is making. Paul’s anti-NATO stance is one he’s actually stuck to for a while now, since it plays exceptionally well with a base forever worried about things like the United Nations coming to indoctrinate your kids or NATO being a secret conspiracy aimed at creating a “one world government.” It’s also gotten him, like numerous other House and Senate Republicans, in some tight spots as he ends up regularly being one of the American lawmakers that “coincidentally” keeps landing on the same talking points Putin’s allies are trying to sell in any given moment of time.
But Paul is arguing that the United States shouldn’t respond to a new war of conquest because the authoritarian government doing the conquesting is, after all, focusing its campaign on annexing territories that fled from their rule after their last authoritarian government ended in crisis and collapse, which is … a very odd argument! And one that, according to Rand Paul himself, he’s, uh, not making! Unless you like it, in which case he is! He’ll look at the Internets later and decide which parts to run with.
I dunno, senator. This sounds a bit like if you called the police because your neighbor got tired of you talking smack, jumped the fence and broke a few of your ribs, then when the police came they just looked at you and said, “This guy has owned the property next door for an awful long time, so we can kind of see where he’s coming from on this.”
And, scene. Once again Rand Paul has used one of the most critical issues of the day to Rand Paul-up a Senate hearing with Rand Paulisms that none of us are going to remember a few weeks from now, but which he’ll use for a new fundraising drive just as soon as his staff can clip the footage. (For the record, as I write this Paul’s Twitter feed still consists mostly of anti-mask statements, including one that claims masks to be “ineffective” and another claiming he has been “vindicated” by a far-right judge deciding that nobody’s gotta wear masks on planes anymore because FrEEdOmZ.)
Contrarian opportunism: A political tactic in which you claim to have a grievance with absolutely everything anyone else says, use that ostensible disagreement to tie up government in such a way that practically requires reporters to flock to him to have him speechify, you solicit donations based on the publicity, and then move on to the next thing. Sometimes it does require you to get rather close to Putin’s own theories that Russia is justified in invading any nation that Russians have ever had historic claims on, so it requires more courage—or at least fewer principles—than you might think.
Devin Nunes makes an appearance on Fox News, begging hosts to sign up for Trump's failed social site
This post was originally published on this site
I don’t know if you heard: Elon Musk has spent—checks notes—$44 billion on the social media application Twitter. Where Musk is leveraging this extraordinary amount of money is predictably shrouded in mystery. That’s how our economic system works! This is something of a bummer as Musk has a long history of being like every other oligarchical wealthy person in the history of the world in regards to his intense interest in himself. The South African Musk, born and raised during the height of apartheid, has a history of running a successful avant-garde electric vehicle business you may have also heard of. That business has a very troubling history of allegedly being run like an archaic white supremacist plantation.
The fact of the matter is that our media, social media, and general forms of news and communication mediums have been consolidated into the control of a few extremely wealthy and powerful hands for some time now. Musk’s acquisition of Twitter isn’t the end of the world in any specific way—just an omen of what has been happening and what will continue to happen without general intervention in our marketplaces by government.
There is a silver lining here: Musk’s continued flirtation with the libertarian-cum-conservative misguided free speech warriors has the potential of stifling an enormous swath of the consumer base that Donald Trump’s Truth Social app was hoping to pull away from the blue tweeting bird. Do I care what happens to Donald Trump and Elon Musk’s assets? Only insofar as it would be nice to see those assets distributed back into the pockets of people who need it more. Other than that, I’m here for Truth Social CEO and GOP thin-skinned lapdog Devin Nunes begging for Fox News on-air personalities to join Truth Social.
RELATED STORY: Top executives jump ship, numbers down, Trump sad, Truth Social is a disaster
Nunes came on Fox News to try and remind viewers that Truth Social is still a thing and definitely not a disaster where two of the technological architects of the application have quietly resigned after the launch was a nightmare and faktriots were complaining of being “censored” within days of signing on. The CEO of Trump Media & Technology group (TMTG) told Fox host Brian Kilmeade that he was happy that Kilmeade had signed on to Truth Social, “but you need to send out some truths if you want to get more people.”
It seems that while many right-wing media celebrities like Steve Bannon have yet to even sign up, the ones who have are not using their accounts—or likely even looking at Truth Social ever. In fact, a big problem over at Truth Social seems to be fake right-wing accounts that Truth Social keeps verifying in the hopes of finding out that they are real accounts. This happened with a fake Fox News account on Truth Social a week or two ago.
RELATED STORY: So much for free speech: Trump’s ‘Truth Social’ Twitter rip-off already banning and censoring users
In the clip below, Nunes even references the sad state of affairs over at Truth Social, attempting to jokingly-not-jokingly implore Kilmeade to both use the app more and post things. “We’re so excited that you’re on Truth—you’re getting followers very very quickly—but you need to send some ‘truths’ out if you want to get more followers.” You see what he did there? He is pretending that Kilmeade is a big part of Truth Social while also saying Brian clearly isn’t using Truth Social. Also, if your business model is based on Kilmeade sending out “some truths out,” you’re in big trouble.
Nunes then transitioned to some MacGuffin about how now that they are on Rumble “cloud servers,” Truth Social cannot be “canceled by any tech tyrants.” This, of course, remains to be seen, as tech billionaires like Musk’s buddy Peter Thiel have spent a lot of money to support Rumble.
Circling back, Nunes reminds Kilmeade to use the app and also puts in a plea for help getting at least one of the Doocy dunces onboard. “But also, Brian, you’re on Truth, we need you to truth, but Doocy—I gotta talk to him. So, he’s got to turn his phone on and click on the app, he’s been let in. Either that or he may be a bot.”
Is there a difference?
RELATED STORY: Don’t buy a Tesla unless you’re okay with Black workers being brutalized by racist managers
Biden grants clemency to 75 nonviolent drug offenders to mark 'Second Chance Month'
This post was originally published on this site
President Biden today announced he would commute the sentences of 75 nonviolent drug offenders, part of a “Second Chance Month” meant to call attention to the failures and systemic racism of the war on drugs. Three pardons were announced, including the pardon of the first Black American to ever serve as part of a presidential Secret Service detail: Abraham Boldon served several years in prison after he was accused in 1964 of trying to sell Secret Service information, but witnesses later recanted their testimony and Boldon himself always maintained the charge was retaliation against him for exposing racism in the agency.
These are the first pardons of Biden’s term. Criminal justice advocates have been hopeful that Biden would use his powers to more broadly grant clemency for those caught in the transparently racist supposed “war on drugs” that resulted in hyperaggressive policing of non-white neighborhoods while ignoring drug use in white ones, but so far Biden’s team has shied away from that sort of boldness. Seventy-five commuted sentences is still a good start, though.
Turning slightly to a media critic role: There are two bits in the reporting on this that are a bit odd and worth calling out. In The Washington Post‘s write-up, we are told:
“Biden’s use of his sweeping clemency powers appears more targeted on righting injustices than his immediate predecessor, Donald Trump, who was known for granting pardons to celebrities and political allies who had broken the law.”
That looks conspicuously like a Post attempt at snark, but it’s probably lost on most readers. A more accurate phrasing would note that Trump notoriously used his pardon powers to immunize political allies who were involved in probes of potentially criminal behavior by Donald Trump. Trump’s pardons were not merely magnanimous attempts at celebrity toe-kissing or rewards to allies but often appeared to be squarely aimed at rewarding close associates who lied or refused to talk to federal investigators about his own acts.
As for CNN, their write-up commits the Trump-era sin of granting anonymity to a “senior administration official” who tells us that Biden is “committed to using his clemency power to provide relief to individuals who are serving long sentences that they could no longer receive today, because of changes in the law, including the First Step Act, which reduced mandatory minimum sentences for certain nonviolent drug offenses” and these are … not statements worth granting anonymity for! Did the reporter simply forget to ask probably-Jen-Psaki to go on the record, or some similar flub that needed to be papered over a bit?
Please, please do not continue the Trump-era habit of granting top administration officials anonymity to provide administration-flattering information that directly and 100% mirrors what the administration itself is saying, even if such information is harmless. During the Trump era it was used by gutless officials to slather Trump with implausible praise and to stovepipe ridiculous talking points without having to take responsibility for saying such intelligence-insulting things. It was essentially a method of dodging public blowback for spouting falsehoods. We don’t need to hear “anonymous” officials giving us the exact same information the White House officially wants to put out. Anonymity is meant to protect sources willing to give information their peers do not want the public to know.
This person is not going to get fired if anyone ever learns that they spilled the beans that Biden “believes that there (are) too many people serving unduly long sentences for nonviolent drug crimes.” We know that. He’s said it. Please have an editorial meeting and hash out what statements deserve anonymity and which statements are just someone in power trying to bend a story to their will without taking public responsibility for their statements. Please.
Now that we’ve gotten my intractable crabbiness out of the way, what should we make of Biden’s use of his powers here? It’s good! The pardons are meant to reward a small set of individuals whose post-conviction lives have been devoted to the public good. The commuted sentences send another clear message reminding the nation that there is a sin here that needs to be corrected. It’s a sin that destroyed American lives for no better reason than a past spate of public paranoia that, as it turned out, served much the same purposes as other race-based paranoias before and since. Let’s do this again next month, and the month after that, and so on. You’re never going to run out of people who deserve clemency when it comes to past drug possessions. Not ever.
Rep. Madison Cawthorn is busted yet again for trying to bring a gun onto a plane
This post was originally published on this site
On Tuesday, WSOC-TV Channel 9 reported that three sources tell them Rep. Madison Cawthorn “was cited for having a gun at Charlotte Douglas International Airport Tuesday morning.” The outlet says that they were given a photo that shows a “loaded Staccato C2,” a 9 mm handgun that was taken away from Cawthorn during a TSA check inside of Charlotte Douglas International Airport.
This would not be the first time Cawthorn has tried to board a plane with a firearm. Back in 2021, Asheville Regional Airport police took away an unloaded “Glock 9mm handgun” that Cawthorn was attempting to board a plane with. At the time, Cawthorn called it a “mistake,” and no charges were filed.
As TSA spokesman Mark Howell told the Citizen Times back in July, Georgia’s gun laws are pretty loosey-goosey compared to other places, and it is reflected in how airport police deal with such offenses. “In New York they perp walk you out of the airport in handcuffs. In Georgia, you can open carry anywhere. It’s different everywhere.”
Cawthorn is clearly fond of keeping weapons on his person. All the time. Every time he violates state or federal laws, Cawthorn seems to get away with less than a slap on the wrist. In September, when Cawthorn was drumming up money by attacking school mask mandates, he was photographed with what seemed to clearly be a dagger tucked into his wheelchair. This was at a school board meeting in Henderson County, North Carolina.
Listen and subscribe to Daily Kos Elections’ The Downballot podcast with David Nir and David Beard
In January 2021, Cawthorn’s strange retelling of events that day made it pretty apparent to most that he had likely carried a firearm, or more than a single firearm, illegally into the House chambers on Jan. 6. He has denied that specific claim but has also been unable to square the circle of how he claimed to possess more than a single firearm that day while not having a chance to return to his office, where elected officials are legally allowed to keep firearms.
RELATED STORY: Republican rep. remains quiet when asked whether he smuggled a firearm into House chamber on Jan. 6
Cawthorn’s strange obsession with guns has extended to not simply illegally carrying them around the Capitol building—he has also been filmed inappropriately cleaning his gun during important hearings on veterans’ affairs. Cawthorn has so many reasons to be kicked out of office, and he continues to violate laws across the country while suffering none of the consequences he demands others suffer.
There has been no comment from Cawthorn about this incident.
Here’s one of three Cawthorn videos of him being pulled over for driving 89 mph without a driver’s license, and being let off with a citation.
Here’s Madison being pulled out for speeding at 87 mph—with a gun in the car.
Mississippi governor vetoes bill that would reverse Jim Crow-era disenfranchisement
This post was originally published on this site
Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves vetoed a bill that would automatically restore voting rights to those who lost them as a result of a constitutional provision penned to disenfranchise Black would-be voters in the Jim Crow era, according to Mississippi Today.
House Judiciary Chair Nick Bain, a Republican legislator, actually drafted the bill the Republican governor has refused to back. Bain told Mississippi Today that courts are already restoring voting rights to people who have had their criminal records expunged and that his bill just “clarified” that judges should be doing so.
That, however, is not how Reeves apparently sees the change. As he put it in a tweet on Friday: “I have vetoed two bills—automatically returning voting rights to criminals and weakening the state’s ethics commission.”
RELATED STORY: Jim Crow-era law to guard against ‘negro rule’ still making criminals of black N.C. voters
The second bill Reeves mentioned, Senate bill No. 2306, would give the Mississippi secretary of state the ability to assess fines to a politician or political committee that failed to make the proper campaign finance disclosure, according to the SuperTalk Mississippi radio network. That power currently rests with the Mississippi Ethics Commission.
“I believed then, as I believe now, that the assessment of penalties for violations of campaign finance disclosure laws should be made by an appointed public body not subject to such laws, as opposed to a single elected official who is subject to such laws,” Reeves reportedly stated in his veto message.
Regarding the proposed voting rights legislation, Senate bill No. 2536, he wrote:
Felony disenfranchisement is an animating principle of the social contract at the heart of every great republic dating back to the founding of ancient Greece and Rome.
In America, such laws date back to the colonies and the eventual founding of our Republic. Since statehood, in one form or another, Mississippi law has recognized felony disenfranchisement.
In filmmaker Ava DuVernay’s 2016 documentary 13th, she portrayed the prison system in America as a natural continuation of slavery following the 13th Amendment, which made slavery unconstitutional in 1865 for all people—except those convicted of crimes. “If you have that embedded in the structure, in this constitutional language, then it’s there to be used as a tool for whichever purposes one wants to use it,” author Kevin Gannon said in the documentary.
Disenfranchisement has certainly been a popular tool, especially targeting the formerly incarcerated.
People convicted of felonies lose the right to vote at least temporarily in every state except Maine and Vermont. Mississippi is one of 11 states that require additional actions after the completion of any jail time and added waiting periods for a formerly incarcerated person to have their right to vote restored, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
The organization cited state law in explaining exactly how the rights of Mississippians are stripped from them when they are incarcerated:
A person convicted of murder, rape, bribery, theft, arson, obtaining money or goods under false pretense, perjury, forgery, embezzlement or bigamy is no longer considered a qualified elector” (Miss. Const. Art. 12, § 241). If an individual hasn’t committed one of these offenses, rights are automatically restored. If an individual has been convicted of one of these, he or she can still receive a pardon from the governor to restore voting rights (Miss. Code Ann. § 47-7-41) or by a two-thirds vote of both houses of the legislature (Miss. Const. Art. 12, § 253).
Mississippi Today writer Bobby Harrison wrote that Mississippi has never allowed the public to vote on a less convoluted process to restore voting rights, and the news service found in 2018 that Black Mississippians represent 61% of those who have been disenfranchised, although they only represent 38% of the state’s population that is of voting age.
“It will be up to the Senate leadership to decide whether to try to overturn the gubernatorial veto during the 2023 session,” Harrison wrote.
RELATED STORY: ‘Slavery, that wretched institution, shaped the Capitol,’ Booker says. It shaped the country
GOP-appointed judge sides with Republican states suing over Title 42 wind down
This post was originally published on this site
The Biden administration’s attempt to end use of Stephen Miller’s anti-asylum Title 42 order by the end of next month appears to have suffered a legal setback following a not unexpected ruling from a federal judge appointed by the insurrectionist president.
Louisiana Judge Robert Summerhays on Monday sided with a number of GOP states that had sued the administration earlier this month (not to be confused with Texas’ lawsuit from last Friday). CBS News reports that the judge intends to stop the administration from winding down the policy before the scheduled May 23 date.
“It’s not yet clear if the order will block the administration from ending Title 42 on May 23, or if it will only prohibit them from starting to wind down the policy before then,” the report said. There’s some confusion among advocates and experts because no actual order has been released as of yet, and CBS News reported the hearing was closed to press.
RELATED STORY: GOP states waste no time suing over Biden admin’s termination of anti-asylum Title 42 policy
But Arizona attorney Mark Brnovich, who sued alongside the noted border states of Louisiana and Missouri, wasted no time celebrating. “We applaud the Court for approving our request for a Temporary Restraining Order to keep Title 42 in place,” a release said. “The Biden administration cannot continue in flagrant disregard for existing laws and required administrative procedures.”
But in authorizing an end to the policy, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) gave officials the May 23 date so there would be “time to implement coronavirus mitigation measures,” CBS News reported at the beginning of the month. So the CDC is allowed to implement an unsound policy … but apparently can’t end the policy it implemented?
None of it makes sense because it’s not supposed to make sense, it’s just about using right-wing judges to implement an anti-immigrant (and anti-Biden) agenda. It’s why Arizona, Louisiana, and Missouri wasted no time suing. Brnovich has made his xenophobic credentials pretty clear all on his own, previously adopting white supremacist rhetoric to describe asylum-seeking families as an “invasion.”
Texas launched its own lawsuit against Title 42 last Friday, which very corrupt Attorney General Ken Paxton eagerly touted as the state’s 10th immigration-related lawsuit against the administration. While there is no decision on that at the moment, the Remain in Mexico policy was back in front of the Supreme Court on Tuesday after it was forcibly reinstated under a lawsuit launched by Paxton and other Republicans. They know they can use the courts to sabotage the president, and they’re not afraid of using that power.
On the same day that Summerhays said he was siding with the GOP states, the Congressional Hispanic Caucus met with President Biden to discuss priorities for the Latino community, including the need to end Miller’s order.
The Hispanic Caucus “made it very clear that the Title 42 policy is a public health emergency policy that was instituted under the Trump administration during his hate and fear anti-immigrant agenda,” Chair Raul Ruiz said in a statement reported by CNN’s Eva McKend. We’ll keep you updated once we know more about Summerhays’ order.
RELATED STORIES: Texas’ corrupt attorney general hopes the courts can yet again help him sabotage Biden’s agenda
Border state advocates say they’re ready to welcome asylum-seekers following Title 42 announcement
LGBTQ advocates remind us that Stephen Miller was scheming policy ‘long before’ COVID ‘even existed’